First: Wilhelmine China
A decade or so ago I had a line about how there were three big potential storm clouds on the horizon–clouds that would probably dissipate, but that we should all fear. They were the (then distant, and now thankfully still distant) possibilities of: (1) Weimar Russia (ex-superpower that thought it had been snookered by the west at the end of a struggle), (2) National Hinduist India (casting Muslims in the historical role traditionally reserved for the Jews), and (3) Wilhelmine China–a rising economic superpower, ruled by a class that had lost its social role, and that contemplated busying giddy minds with foreign quarrels as a way to distract popular attention from internal problems and debates.
Let me highlight this. Why? Because Martin Wolf has also been worrying about Wilhelmine China. The problem is that a social class that has lost its role–whether it is the Prussian aristocracy before 1914 or the cadres of the CCP today–knows that it has lost its role, and fears what the future brings. The task of United States (and Japanese, and Korean) foreign policy has to be to persuade the cadres of the CCP that they have much more to gain from an Eastern Pacific that lives up to its name rather than from a new cold war in Asia–or a hot one:
Martin Wolf: China Must Not Copy the Kaiser’s Errors: ’Will we sustain an open global economy while also managing tensions between a rising autocracy and democracies in relative economic decline? That was the question posed by the arrival of imperial Germany as Europe’s leading economic and military power in the late 19th century. It is the question posed today by the rise of communist China…. We know how this story ended in 1914. How will the new one end, a century later? China’s decision to create an “East China Sea air defence identification zone” that covers uninhabited islands currently under the control of Japan (called Senkaku by Japan and Diaoyu by China) is evidently provocative: the two countries’ air defence zones now overlap. Neither Japan nor South Korea recognises the new zone, which China seems prepared to defend. The US does not recognise the zone either, and is bound by treaty to support Japan…. The risk of a ruinous conflict again exists…. Why would the Chinese president take such a provocative action?… This was just the question raised by Norman Angell, the English liberal, in his 1909 book The Great Illusion. Angell did not argue, as some allege, that war among the European great powers was inconceivable…. He argued instead that a war would be fruitless, even for the victors…. Mr Xi should think again—and halt…
LINK: <https://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2013/12/wilhelmine-china-and-the-ecsadiz.html>
One Video:
For thirty years I have wanted a computer that was a tablet when I needed it to be, and that I could plug in a keyboard when I wanted one. The Microsoft Surface never quite got there for me. Now here we have Christopher Lawley claiming that the iPad Pro now has:
Christopher Lawley: iPad Pro 2021 Review: The Only Computer I Need <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxPNaYPPkCs>
Very Briefly Noted:
Daniel Coleman: Biography of William Volker (1859–1947), Businessman and Philanthropist <https://kchistory.org/islandora/object/kchistory%3A115389>
Greg Mankiw (1991): The Reincarnation of Keynesian Economics <https://web.archive.org/web/20070610024139/https://www.iisec.ucb.edu.bo/amercado/clases/macroeconomia_maestria/lecturas/The_reincarnation_of_keynesian_economics.pdf>
Ben Bernanke: On Milton Friedman’s Ninetieth Birthday <https://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021108/>
Daniel Kuehn: James Buchanan, Gordon Tullock, & the “Radically Irresponsible” One Person, One Vote Decisions <https://osf.io/zetq4/>
Christina Pazzanese: Arthur Goldhammer on the Art of Translation: ‘Arthur Goldhammer looks back on a life bringing the work of Thomas Piketty and others to readers of English… <https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/09/arthur-goldhammer-on-the-art-of-translation/>
Douglas Irwin: The GATT’s Contribution to Economic Recovery in Western Europe <https://web.archive.org/web/20080910051604/http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dirwin/GATT%20contribution.pdf>
Angelica Oung: 🇹🇼Ten Taiwanese Wins: ‘As #Taiwanisacountry trends, here are some awesome things new Taiwan Stans ought to know… <https://taipology.substack.com/p/ten-taiwanese-wins>
Eric Boehlert: ‘The last thing the [Washington Post] wanted during this key transition period was to be grappling with doubts about Buzbee’s leadership. But after watching the Winter debacle unfold last week at the AP, it’s impossible to not question the editor’s newsroom guidance… <https://twitter. com/EricBoehlert/status/1396806015635558400>
Paragraphs:
I kinda suspect this restaurant owner would have a very difficult time surviving in a world in which workers have at least some pricing power:
Dave Jamieson: ’Guy who runs restaurants wants unemployment benefits cut, seems surprised by stubbornness of job seekers: “‘How much do you pay?’ that’s one of the first questions out of their mouth”. I think that would be the first question out of my mouth, but I’m in the unique position of having to feed and clothe children…
LINK: <https://twitter.com/jamieson/status/1396830864416428032>
Am I paranoid? Or is it truly, truly the case that a critical mass of senior Republican politicians and activists were abused as children? That really seems to be the model they are using as they react to their abuse by Trump:
Paul Krugman: Republican Cowardice Endangers American Democracy: ‘Conspiracy theorizing is hardly a new thing in our national life; Richard Hofstadter wrote “The Paranoid Style in American Politics” back in 1964. White rage has been a powerful force at least since the civil rights movement. What’s different this time is the acquiescence of Republican elites. The Big Lie about the election didn’t well up from the grass roots—it was promoted from above, initially by Trump himself, but what’s crucial is that almost no prominent Republican politicians have been willing to contradict his claims and many have rushed to back them up…
LINK: <https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/24/opinion/republicans-donald-trump-loyalty.html>
Jeet Heer: Beatnik Phrenology: ‘Nathaniel Weyl… wrote: “Thus, white Rhodesians are an elite element within the English-speaking world in terms of psychometric intelligence. This finding is reinforced by visual impressions. Salisbury whites appear larger, healthier, more vigorous, alert and bright than London whites. Beatniks, transvestites and obvious homosexuals are conspicuously absent…” I don’t want to belabour the obvious, but we are not dealing with a scientific mind here. Yet Weyl was much admired by the National Review circle of the 1950s and 1960s, not just by Kendall but also by William F. Buckley…
LINK: <https://jeetheer.substack.com/p/beatnik-phrenology>
John Stoehr: The Senate GOP Is Ready to Block a Bipartisan Commission to Investigate the Insurrection. Is It Time for Filibuster Reform?: ‘While all but four Senate Republicans are leaning away from patriotism, Democrat Joe Manchin is leaning into it…. Whatever he does, however, has to be seen as nowhere near being partisan. That’s why he’s leaning into God and country. On hearing news of the Republicans preparing to block the bill, he told reporters: “So disheartening. It makes you really concerned about our country… I’m still praying we’ve still got 10 good solid patriots within that conference.” The hoped-for “10 good solid patriots” do not exist…. So we have Manchin leaning into patriotism while all but four Republicans are leaning away from patriotism, filibustering the legislation, probably today. At the same time, Manchin said, “There is no excuse for any Republican to vote against this commission.” Hell, he’s got on his side the mom of a dead Capitol cop, who said: “I suggest that all congressmen and senators who are against this bill visit my son’s grave” (my italics). This is one of those rare moments after which we might see some clarity. If there’s a time to act on the filibuster—in the name of God and country—now might be that time… LINK: <https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-senate-gop-is-ready-to-block>
(Remember: You can subscribe to this… weblog-like newsletter… here:
There’s a free email list. There’s a paid-subscription list with (at the moment, only a few) extras too.)
I think there is some confusion about the Republican party. Trump is not an anomaly. He is an incarnation. Republicans were and are very happy with Trump, and they still adore him. Republicans also know that a lot of American voters loathe Trump, so they need to SAY they don't like him, they want to move on and so on.
As Nancy Reagan would have explained it, they just say "no". They don't mean it. They actually want it. Look at how 2016 played out. It was all "just don't throw me in the briar patch", and when Trump won, it was "born and bred in the briar patch". I know that Uncle Remus stories are out of fashion, and for good reason, but that story should be more familiar and could be retold without the offensive stereotypes.
Consider the scene in Pretty Baby after Brooke Shields' character, a young girl raised in a whorehouse, auctions off her virginity. Everyone, the whores, the johns and even the underage prostitute joins in a celebration. Meanwhile, the guy who won the auction and got his sex with a virgin slinks out the back way. That's the Republican dilemma. There's what they want, and there's just how horrifying their wants are.
Another stray space in the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxPNaYPPkCs
I've been intrigued and doubtful about the iPad Pro. I expect to use my 2015 macbook air till the battery dies or some such (as my unique computer, or anyway the unique device I use as a computer, sometimes with a 2nd monitor). And then I suppose replace it by a new macbook air if they don't discontinue them or break something along the way. And I like having unix underneath, for tweaks, grep, and the like.
The iPad series doesn't allow Turing complete apps, in particular no real versions of TeX, not to mention the software I use on the rare occasions that I actually need to compute something. So it's not a computer as far as I'm concerned. Though when my iPad 2 finally breaks in a more serious way than its slightly cracked screen, I suppose I might see whether the Pro is something I'd want to use as more than a reader, which is what my iPad does, and does well.