Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarora's avatar

"Give me full employment, a competitive exchange rate, and proper funding by the government of infrastructure and technical education, and you have done 90% of the good that I think optimal industrial policy could do. Give me a large push to make gaining education, technical, and apprenticeship-like skills easy, and I think you have taken care of a bunch of our maldistribution concerns as well."

Bingo! I was going to add one more "give me" to this list, but then realized that "... proper funding by the government...." should take care of it.

Expand full comment
Jay L Gischer's avatar

I don't actually have much trouble explaining success with Tesla and SpaceX but not Twitter. Elon does not understand people, I feel it quite likely he is spectrum. He is definitely "not a people person" as a friend who worked for Tesla once told me.

With Tesla this didn't matter. People understanding - things like making it look cool - could be delegated. With SpaceX it didn't matter either. With Twitter it matters in spades. Twitter business is getting people to use and engage. Also, Twitter was an existing business with lots of mindshare already, and lots of cheese to move.

Twitter was clearly in financial trouble already. Lots of things would have to change, many oxen were due to be gored, and much cheese to move. Elon is not cautious about things like that, which can be useful, even if it doesn't work out well in the short term.

Tesla may have already existed when he took it over, but nobody knew much about it.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts