Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex Tolley's avatar

re: Racism and neofascism.

And the thin-skinned Trump was intent on dismantling Obama's successes in retaliation for the humilation Obama meted out on him at the White House Correspondents dinner. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeGpLg0b3DE&pp=ygUqb2JhbWEgaHVtaWxhdGVzIHRydW1wIGF0IGpvdW5hbGlzdHMgZGlubmVy

Trump always says he will return any attack with 5x the severity. One can imagine what he will do to Biden et al after teh humiliation of the loss of the 2020 election.

Philip Koop's avatar

"The men of my generation have not lost the memory of the years 1931-1935. While Anglo-Saxon currencies were devalued, the value of the franc was proudly maintained, but the French economy was ruined. In short, our partners do not refuse to put pressure on the American authorities; they fear triggering a crisis of which the entire Western world would be a victim."

Hmm. I don't think David Glasner would put it quite like that; he'd probably say something about "the insane Bank of France."

"American privilege is largely responsible for the origin of the deficit, namely capital outflows."

Isn't this a reversal of causality? Please accept my abject apologies if I am misremembering or misrepresenting your friend Barry Eichengreen, but my recollection was that he identified three advantages to printing the reserve currency:

1) Your domestic firms pay no FX-related transaction costs.

2) Your domestic firms are not exposed to currency risk (or do not have to pay the cost of hedging) because they buy their inputs and sell their outputs in the same currency.*

3) You accrue seigniorage; foreign entities must sell you something of value in order to maintain a working balance to lubricate international transactions, and their central banks must maintain a prudent reserve holding in your currency (hence its *reserve* status.)

Point 3 seems to *require* the reserve currency provider to run a current account deficit?

* Not only domestic firms! For example, this is how a Canadian hedge fund makes a bet on a US stock: they do not sell CAD for USD, take a position in the stock, then buy CAD for USD when they liquidate the position. Instead, they borrow USD and post CAD as collateral, and put on the stock position with borrowed USD. This exposes them to collateral calls, and they must pay the difference between the USD rate and the CAD rate; but of course, the latter is often negative. But the point is that if their USD bet is correct and results in a nominal profit in USD, that always translates to a nominal profit in CAD, instead of potentially being wiped out by an adverse FX swing.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?