HOLIDAY: Presidents' Day: A Republic, If We Can Keep It
I do not know what today's Republicans want America to be, but it is certainly not a democratic republic. And it is certainly not any form of "populism" that I am aware of. Perhaps we should classi...
…fy their goal as a minority ethnocentric demogocracy? "Neofascist" still seems the best word to me, but I am told that is much, much, much too impolite to use, even on the internet:
No, Alexander Hamilton was not a president. But he should have been:
Alexander Hamilton (1787): America as "Grand Experiment": Federalist #9: It is impossible to read the history of the petty republics of Greece and Italy without feeling sensations of horror and disgust at the distractions with which they were continually agitated, and at the rapid succession of revolutions by which they were kept in a state of perpetual vibration between the extremes of tyranny and anarchy…. From the disorders… advocates of despotism have drawn arguments… against the forms of republican government… [and] decried all free government as inconsistent with the order of society…. I trust America will be the broad and solid foundation of other edifices… which will be… permanent monuments of their errors.
But it is not to be denied that… if it had been found impracticable to have devised models of a more perfect structure [than the petty republics of Greece and Italy], the enlightened friends to liberty would have been obliged to abandon the cause of that species of government as indefensible. The science of politics, however… has received great improvement… distribution of power into distinct departments… balances and checks… judges holding their offices during good behavior… representation of the people… by deputies of their own election… are means, and powerful means, by which the excellences of republican government may be retained and its imperfections lessened or avoided…
Plus, as always:
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure….
It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Why do liberals proclaim their desire for checks and balances and then want to do away with super-majority in the Senate? The main check and balance created to protect against simple majority rule of citizens?
The "neo" is completely unnecessary. Same problem -- I am totally committed to a failed system -- and same response -- I am going to force people to take me seriously and reaffirm my status -- without much in the way of being able to solve any real problems, run the economy, and so on.
Thing y'all need to be figuring out how to do is how to make adherence to fascism make you poor especially if your start point is "billionaire". Total apostasy from the viewpoint of keep-the-loot white supremacy, but oh so necessary to getting the oligarchical collectivism to stop. Paying your taxes is a duty of citizenship; trying to be special with respect to your taxes is an act of rebellion and appropriately punished as rebellion.
Thing after that is to stop believing that the system works, figure out what would work, and enact that. There's very little time before food gets short. (If you can get the raw agriculture stats, you can probably track the price of hay. Look at the change in variance over time.)