Discussion about this post

User's avatar
elm's avatar

"With the weblog audience the channel is much more to weigh: one has a chance to revise and correct and re-orient because it is, by and large, a recurring audience that one is communicating with."

They (and I!) have helped bash the thing into shape (however annoying that might of been), where there might have been bum stretches. Also, I've read the two previous books, and there's no reason to think there is a serious error there, or anything else.

"I am also quite scared."

I don't see any reason for it. Unless they've marketed it wrong ('A Gripping, Sordid Tale of One Man and His Obsession With Historical Economic Statistics') (the publishing industry *totally* mismarkets things like that!), there's no reason to worry that someone picking it up not understanding what they're getting (although someone surely will). They'll pitch it to the Smart Set, and the Smart Set will dutifully buy it (although I suppose it won't have as many tasty readbaits like 'abortion reduces black crime'); I have no idea if they'll get anything out of it, but if one reads the oped pages, one sometimes doesn't know how anyone gets anything out of anything including attending a Good School.

It should be fine! If it truly catastrophically fails (it seems we've passed the point of that possibly happening), I am pretty sure it'll be a failure of reading comprehension plus acts of chaos.

elm

you wrote an important book, dude, what other driving reason is there for an academic career?

Expand full comment
John Howard Brown's avatar

Writing after cataract operation. Substitute prose for proud and guarantees a large audience.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts