Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Field's avatar

The quote from Noah Smith reminds me yet again why I don't find him worthwhile to read: his political opinions are *so* bad. It is simply not the case that liberals need to "accomodate" (read "appease") conservatives, particularly under the threat of conservatives adopting "reactionary illiberal" options. No, conservatives have agency too, not just liberals; it's conservatives who need to accept (not just "accomodate") democracy. "Reactionary illiberal" options are *never* on the table, certainly not as a threat.

What makes his comment still worse is that he's vague about what issues liberals need to "surrender" while implying that abortion and trans rights are 2 of them. But both of those involve fundamental human rights, as well as a rejection of state control over personal medical decisions. Surrender on those issues would simply permit conservatives to aim at other targets until they reach the "reactionary illiberalism" that Smith doesn't demand they reject.

Expand full comment
John Crespi's avatar

I bought both the paper and kindle versions of Slouching. It's interesting to see on Kindle what passages people are highlighting. "North Atlantic economies had invented invention" is a turn of phrase that 35 people seem to have liked, for example.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts