Okay, cousin, I'll take the bait... I agree with Locke that one has a right to the fruits of one's labor,, but I also agree with the socialists that mere ownership shouldn't generate income.
So, I argue that one has a right to that income which is sufficient to motivate one to mix labor with some property, but any income greater than that is rent.
Okay, cousin, I'll take the bait... I agree with Locke that one has a right to the fruits of one's labor,, but I also agree with the socialists that mere ownership shouldn't generate income.
So, I argue that one has a right to that income which is sufficient to motivate one to mix labor with some property, but any income greater than that is rent.
Okay, cousin, I'll take the bait... I agree with Locke that one has a right to the fruits of one's labor,, but I also agree with the socialists that mere ownership shouldn't generate income.
So, I argue that one has a right to that income which is sufficient to motivate one to mix labor with some property, but any income greater than that is rent.