1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

I would suggest the situation in Gaza is akin to strategic bombing, and so is thinkable. Putin seems to think that the use of nuclear weapons is now "thinkable", but to be fair, Reagan was apparently prepared to use "battlefield nukes" in the 1980s, and US presidents haven't exactly pursued disarmament in teh C21st. Rational thinkers and war gamers know that escalation to nukes is likely in any serious conflict. We are lucky Kruschev backed down over the Cuban Missile Crisis. Didn't Churchill want to nuke Moscow in when the West had nukes but before the Soviets did?

My guess is that as time goes on, the horrors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki will be forgotten, just as other hard lessons seem to be forgotten after 2-3 generations, and some idot will think "this time is different" and catastrophe will be upon us. For a while it seemed that Idia and Pakistan might be the first to break the nuclear weapon taboo. Then Israel apparently suggested Iran was a good target for a nuclear attack. North Korea is just plain crazy and threatens Seoul.

Want to bet that tensions won't result in the use of these "toys"- possibly in what remains of my lifetime? It probably won't be a good idea to survive a nuclear attack.

Expand full comment