6 Comments
User's avatar
Flagbuzz's avatar

I'd be interested to see an additional metrics - gini, wellness, happiness - mapped to the timeseries. Would the long ruling Chinese dynasties, which were being outperformed economically by European innovation, actually provide higher levels of comfort to their masses? Does a comfortable populace mean less innovation? Do diversity and unease go hand in hand ("above all else humanity desires stability"... paraphase)? Once humans gain a certain level of comfort - do they stop striving?

Expand full comment
Brad DeLong's avatar

Pre-industrial societies are, overwhelmingly, not comfortable places to live at all. I think you can say that China had a higher population density conditional on the quality of land to support agriculture, and less omnipresent banditry. But I think that is pretty much all you can say...

Expand full comment
Mark Field's avatar

I read this on your previous recommendation and thought it was excellent. Thanks.

Expand full comment
A. Reader's avatar

Did ChatGPT do this summary? (And is that what this format would be called?). I ask because it uses at least one word ('ecology') that doesn't appear to be in the book, according to Amazon Cloud Reader.

Expand full comment
Anders's avatar

Thanks Bradford, a bit heavy going but worth it and by the way this stack alone is worth the little money I contribute.

Expand full comment
Michael Dawson's avatar

You aren't wrong on this. It's great stuff.

Expand full comment