4 Comments
User's avatar
Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

Drezner: The China Shock was mainly about transportation and communications technology, not policy. The main contribution of policy was dollar overvaluation caused by fiscal deficits.

https://thomaslhutcheson.substack.com/p/dollars-and-deficits

https://thomaslhutcheson.substack.com/p/policy-tariffs-and-trade-3-china

Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

Central Country: My guess is that with today's regulatory framework the Eastern terminus of the Transcontinental Railroad would be Oakland.

I was just looking at the BART and see that it hardly goes south of SF at all! ???

Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

What is called "mezoeconomics" still sounds like microeconomics to me. I'd like to see a head-to-head use of "mezoeconomics" vs "microeconomics" to do policy analysis.

Let's hope "mezoeconomics" is not just how you wave your hands when microeconomics does not give you the result you want.

Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

"Second… the high degree of uncertainty about r-star means that one should not overly rely on estimates of r-star in determining the appropriate setting of monetary policy at a given point in time…"

And since monetary policy is only made at one point in time per time. that means not to rely on r-star ever. :)

I'd guess that whatever variables go into estimating r-star _would_ be relevant in estimating discount rate for use in public investment decisions.